Penis Fertilizer

There’s always a temptation to try to make money from a blog. I’m sure you’ve seen sites that promote books, stories, and pictures for sale. This is the tried-and-true revenue generator for otherwise free sites. There’s nothing implicitly wrong with this idea. I’ve noticed that the same information that is being sold is often available free on other sites.

A different revenue source is commissions. Very often, when links are provided to products discussed in a post, it is special and if you buy, the blogger gets a cut of what you spend. You don’t spend more for the product. The commission is paid by the people selling the product. This is fine as long as the review of the item is honest.

Sometimes, you will see a blogger talk about how great a product is to do something that common sense says isn’t possible. One blogger is touting pills that make male orgasms more intense and produce more semen.

This is a topic of some interest to me. My semen production is poor. I’ve done a lot of research on the topic. According to reputable sources, nothing will substantially change this; certainly not an herbal pill. Some people say they do get results from these pills. Maybe they do, but the evidence suggests the pills are a waste of money. Worse, every so often a blogger will claim personal success at the same time he publishes a commission-producing ad for the product. That smells really bad to me.

We don’t carry ads and never accept a commission for the sale of any product we discuss here on the blog. Any links I provide to a source contains nothing that would result in money coming back to me. The Journal produces no income. In fact, it costs us quite a bit to publish

The reason I’m posting about this is that I’ve come across at least one case where someone is making money claiming an herbal orgasm/semen enhancer works. My research suggests it doesn’t. I wish it or some thing else would. I’d take it myself.

Penis extending or semen increasing remedies are very popular scams. Many of us wish we could do better in one or both of those areas. Legitimate drug companies have spent hundreds of millions of dollars looking for a way to do this. They’ve had no luck so far.

If you are considering one of the many products claiming to extend your boner or help you squirt buckets of semen, instead of reading claims from the seller, do some research. You can save a lot of money after a few Google searches.


I was not feeling well yesterday. New medication was messing with me and I was also really tired. I’d feel okay, start to move and then I wasn’t okay. Needless to say, no play went on in our house last night.

Today, however, I’m determined to give Lion his play spanking. He was looking forward to it since I mentioned it in my post. He might have even been drooling at the thought of it. Since I forgot to take the new medicine this morning, I should be fine later.

I think the biggest difference between a play spanking and a punishment/maintenance spanking is that I start off a play spanking with my hands. Sometimes I only use my hands. Other times I graduate to paddles or floggers or a combination of things. I also stop from time to time to rub those rosy cheeks and even kiss them. I never do that during a punishment spanking.

Big Ring And Little Cage

Deciding on a male chastity device isn’t easy. The motive for wearing one is usually based on a desire to transfer sexual control to another person, the keyholder. Once the device is locked on, all sorts of hot things can happen. It’s ironic, but some of us get turned on by not being allowed to get aroused.

Go figure.

That’s not the only inherent contradiction embodied in male chastity. Take the device. It’s supposed to be an escape-proof vault that prevents erection and orgasm. Its wearer is only able to pee. Otherwise, the penis is useless unless released by the keyholder.

That’s the fantasy. Of course, male chastity is a consensual sport that is almost always initiated by the man. Women don’t generally spend a lot of time thinking about penises. If they do, it’s about how one can provide them with pleasure, not how to lock them up.

The idea of penis bondage is a male concept. Some women like the idea once it’s introduced to them, but it is unlikely they will be obsessed about the mechanism to do it. Mrs. Lion is happy using a short length of lightweight rope for the purpose. Concern about the hardware is on me alone.

Guys with experience, or newbies who take the time to do some research, discover that practical devices for male chastity aren’t inescapable prisons. In fact, the general solution to caging a penis is a tube or cage connected to a ring around the penis and balls. The ring has to be small enough to prevent a ball from slipping out if is worn without the cage. Any smaller is asking for discomfort.

.Please note that I didn’t say tight enough to make escape impossible. A lot of guys, even men who should know better, keep trying tighter and tighter base rings. At some point, they resort to lube to reduce the pain caused by the friction of a tight ring. Even with a scrotum-choking ring, escape is absolutely possible since the penis can be worked out without removing the ring.

That’s the thing. Any device held on by a band around cock and balls can be escaped. Devices can make the process very painful, but escape is still a possibility. A lot of pain and expense can be spared by just accepting this fact. Remember, you agreed to wear it. What’s the point of trying to get out?

Ironically, many guys look for the roomiest cage possible. The want a constricting base ring attached to a cage their penises swim in. I think this choice is the result of a anatomical misunderstanding. Most guys think about their penises when they are hard, or remember things that happened when they were aroused. A hard penis needs its space. It hurts to try to compress it too much. So, the reasoning goes, if a hard cock can be hurt by fencing it in, a soft one has a similar vulnerability.

To a large degree that’s not true. A soft weenie is very compressible. You can easily press the head and make it less than an inch long. You would be less successful squeezing the head to make it have a smaller diameter. The conclusion: a penis cage can be very short but needs to be wide enough to avoid too much squeezing .

From my experience, the most comfortable and erection-proof cages are very short, but wide enough to only compress the diameter by a quarter of an inch or so. My flaccid penis is about 2-1/2 inches in length most of the time. It can be much shorter after a cold dip in the pool, and quite a bit longer for no good reason.

I’ve discovered that those measurements have no real importance in fitting a chastity device. In my case, I’m very much at home in a cage measuring 1-1/4 inches in length. Your experience may vary. I would suggest that all but the most enormous cocks will live happily in a cage under two inches long.

My point is that fitting a chastity device is counter intuitive for most guys. Most important is comfort; least important, security. The base ring should be large enough for comfort without having a ball slip out when it is worn without the cage. The cage itself should be only slightly narrower in diameter than its occupant, but should be a lot shorter. A good gauge of length is the size after a nice, cold swim. You get the idea.

Try the idea out with an inexpensive, Chinese cage. has lots of them. You may be surprised by how good it feels to go wide on the ring and short on the cage.

Good Old Fashioned Whomping

Sometimes (usually) I run into problems when Lion suggests changes. Or, more correctly, when I perceive he’s suggested a change. Case in point: his recent posts about cages.

Yesterday I suggested that the blog has replaced the cage when you consider the importance in our lives. The cage was meant to focus our attention on sex and play. It did its job. Now I think the blog has done the same thing. In my post I suggested that the cage is no longer needed, but perhaps we could use it, as Lion wrote in a different post, on weekends as a toy. He doesn’t like that idea.

Locking Lion up again has been something we’ve discussed off and on for a while. We haven’t come up with a solution. He wants to be locked up except when he is locked up. I want him to be locked up except when I have to lock him up or unlock him. It’s an inconvenience. Does that mean it’s not worth it? Up to now I think it does. We still have some thinking to do.

Lion had a lot going on yesterday and didn’t remind me about punishment day in his emails. I didn’t say anything. I just waited. He has until 8:30 pm. At around 7 he reminded me. He does have reminders set on his phone but if he’s not in the room when it dings he’s sort of out of luck. Good thing he remembered on his own.

I was thinking tonight might be a good night for a whomping. Of course, it doesn’t have to be a maintenance spanking. It might just be a good old fashioned play spanking. He hasn’t had one of those in a very long time.